HARTNESS v. YOUNG

No. 37027.

299 P.2d 171 (1956)

Susie HARTNESS, sometimes known as Mrs. Lige Hartness or Mrs. Elige Hartness, Plaintiff in Error, v. F.S. YOUNG and Vincent Grindle, and John F. Pendleton, Defendants in Error.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Rehearing Denied July 20, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Neptune & Stocker, Robert H. Neptune, and A.O. Harrison, Bartlesville, for plaintiff in error.

John F. Pendleton, Nowata, Richard K. Harris, Bartlesville, for defendants in error.


PER CURIAM.

The correctness of the trial court's judgment hinges upon the question of what rights and interests were conveyed by a certain instrument denominated "Conveyance of Oil and Gas Royalty" pertaining to certain real estate situated in Washington County. Defendants in error are successors in interest to grantee and plaintiff in error successor in interest to the grantor.

Defendants in error, as plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases