1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 236 F.2d
  5. 236 F.2d 228 (1956)
 

NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN & H. R. CO. v. BALTIMORE & OHIO R. CO.

No. 290, Docket 23909.

236 F.2d 228 (1956)

NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN AND HARTFORD RAILROAD COMPANY, Libelant-Appellee, v. The BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY, Respondent-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Decided July 16, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward R. Brumley, New York City (R. M. Peet, New York City, of counsel on the brief), proctor for libelant-appellee.

Bigham, Englar, Jones & Houston, New York City (Andrew J. McElhinney and Donald W. Waesche, Jr., New York City, of counsel on the brief), proctors for respondent-appellant.

Before FRANK, LUMBARD and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges.

LUMBARD, Circuit Judge.

This case arose out of a collision in the East River between a carfloat in tow of the Baltimore & Ohio's tug William J. Dickey and a carfloat in tow of the New York, New Haven and Hartford's tug Transfer No. 15. The New Haven brought a suit against the B. & O. in admiralty to recover for the damages resulting from the collision. Judge Galston found the Dickey at fault and gave judgment for the libellant for the entire damages. From...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases