TAYLOR FORGE & PIPE WORKS v. NAT. LABOR REL. BD.

No. 11617.

234 F.2d 227 (1956)

TAYLOR FORGE & PIPE WORKS, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit.

June 6, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert W. MacDonald, Henry E. Seyfarth, Lee C. Shaw, Owen Fairweather, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner.

David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, William J. Avrutis, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D. C., Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Mozart G. Ratner, Jacobs, Kamin & Ratner, Chicago, Ill., for Forge and Machine Workers Industrial Union, amicus curiae.

Before DUFFY, Chief Judge, and MAJOR and FINNEGAN, Circuit Judges.


MAJOR, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner, while engaged in bargaining negotiations with the Forge and Machine Workers Union, the statutory bargaining representative of its employees, refused the Union's request for information as to certain "point ratings" which petitioner used in determining each employee's rate of pay. The Board (with two members dissenting) concluded that the requested information was relevant and essential to the parties' bargaining and that, consequently...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases