1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.H.
  4. 100 N.H.
  5. 100 N.H. 346 (1956)
 

PINET v. NEW HAMPSHIRE FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY

No. 4516.

100 N.H. 346 (1956)

LUCIEN PINET v. NEW HAMPSHIRE FIRE INSURANCE CO.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire.

Decided October 31, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Maurice E. Lemelin (by brief and orally), for the plaintiff.

Sheehan, Phinney & Bass and Frederick W. Branch (Mr. Branch orally), for the defendant.

KENISON, C. J.

Although the plaintiff suffered a total loss of his chinchillas, he cannot invoke the valued policy statute since by its terms it applies only to "buildings" (RSA 407:8; Lamb v. Insurance Company, 88 N.H. 21) and as to personal property the insured is obligated to establish the amount of his loss. Moreau v. Insurance Company, 84 N.H. 422. In determining the amount of the loss, the first question to be decided is whether the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases