RUBY v. FARMERS MUT. AUTOMOBILE INS. CO.


274 Wis. 158 (1956)

RUBY, Appellant, vs. FARMERS MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

December 4, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Homer J. Williams, attorney, and Lowry & Hunter of counsel, all of Waukesha, and oral argument by Mr. Williams and Mr. Richard Hunter.

For the respondent there was a brief by Hannan, Johnson & Goldschmidt, attorneys, and Herbert L. Wible of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Wible.


BROWN, J.

Plaintiff acquired a ring containing one large and two small diamonds and procured a policy from defendant insuring him in the sum of $2,500 against loss through theft. The policy contained the provision:

"Theft.—The word `theft' includes larceny, burglary, and robbery. Mysterious disappearance of any insured property shall be presumed to be due to theft."

Mr. Ruby owned and operated a farm and a dairy business. On May 14, 1952, he...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases