GATES v. HARTFORD


143 Conn. 289 (1956)

FLORENCE E. GATES v. CITY OF HARTFORD ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided March 16, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Horace E. Rockwell, for the appellant (plaintiff).

Frank A. Murphy, with whom, on the brief, were John J. Kenny and Alexander A. Goldfarb, for the appellees (named defendant et al.).

INGLIS, C. J., BALDWIN, O'SULLIVAN, WYNNE and DALY, JS.


BALDWIN, J.

The basic facts in this case are similar to those in Sullivan v. Town Council, decided this day, and they present the identical legal question. The decision of that case controls the decision of this one.

There is error, the judgment is set aside and the case is remanded with direction to deny the motion to erase.

In this opinion the other judges...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases