RANDALL v. PINGREE

No. 4501.

100 N.H. 322 (1956)

ARTHUR G. RANDALL d/b/a RANDALL SALES AND SERVICE v. LAWRENCE PINGREE.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire.

Decided October 2, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Grinnell & Grinnell and Aaron A. Harkaway (Mr. Harkaway orally), for the plaintiff.

Joseph E. Stancik (by brief and orally), for the defendant.


DUNCAN, J.

Laws 1945, c. 104, purported to be an enactment of the Uniform Conditional Sales Act. (S. 32). For convenience in cross-reference the sections of the 1945 act, which correspond in numbering with those of the Uniform Act, will be referred to herein, rather than those of RSA ch. 361, supra, some of which were changed by insertion of RSA 361:11, first enacted in 1951. The Uniform Act was adopted by several states as early as 1919 and has...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases