Per Curiam.
As the last paragraph of our opinion (163 Ohio St., at 438) indicates, it was not the intention of this court to disturb the September 7, 1954, judgment of the Court of Appeals any more than necessary. Otherwise, we would have reversed that judgment. We believe that an order of the Court of Appeals containing only the paragraphs of its above-quoted order of July 12, 1955, numbered for identification as paragraphs 1, 2, 7, 12 and 13, probably would...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
