1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ga.
  4. 93 Ga.
  5. 93 Ga. App. 324 (1956)
 

PULLIAM v. CASEY

36010.

93 Ga. App. 324 (1956)

91 S.E.2d 807

PULLIAM v. CASEY.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided February 10, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. T. Sisk, for plaintiff in error.

Compton O. Baker, Robert M. Heard, contra.

QUILLIAN, J.

1. The defendant contends that there was not sufficient evidence to support the verdict for the plaintiff. The facts set forth in this opinion show that there was sufficient evidence from which the jury could determine that the defendant was negligent, and that this negligence was the proximate cause of the injuries sustained by the plaintiff. The general grounds of the motion for a new trial are without merit.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases