VAN WASSENHOVE v. HELTZEL


208 Or. 207 (1956)

300 P.2d 783

IN RE ESTATE OF NAN M. WAGNER, DECEASED. VAN WASSENHOVE ET AL v. HELTZEL ET AL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed August 22, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George A. Rhoten, Salem, argued the cause for appellants. On the brief were Rhoten, Rhoten & Speerstra and Carlotta Hendricks, Salem.

Wallace P. Carson, Salem, argued the cause for respondent John A. Heltzel, Executor. With him on the brief were Allan G. Carson and Peter M. Gunnar, Salem.

Robert A. Bennett, Portland, argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent Oregon-Washington Pythian Home.

Catherine Zorn, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent Doernbecher Memorial Hospital for Children. With her on the brief was Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General, Salem.

Before WARNER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, LATOURETTE and PERRY, Justices.


AFFIRMED.

ROSSMAN, J.

This is an appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court for Marion County, Probate Department, which, after trial, (1) overruled the contest of an instrument presented for probate by the proponent-respondent as the last will and testament of Nan M. Wagner, deceased, and (2) held that the instrument presented by the proponent-respondent was the last will of the decedent, that the latter had not revoked it and that it was entitled to probate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases