FERDINAND v. AGRICULTURAL, ETC., OF WATERTOWN, N.Y.


40 N.J. Super. 1 (1956)

122 A.2d 1

E. JAY FERDINAND AND PHYLLIS C. FERDINAND, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. AGRICULTURAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF WATERTOWN, NEW YORK, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND APPLETON & COX, INC., ETC., DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 2, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. George I. Janow of the New York Bar argued the cause for the defendant-appellant (Mr. Samuel Dreskin, attorney).

Mr. Frederick C. Vonhof argued the cause for the plaintiffs-respondents (Mr. Albert M. Neiss, attorney).

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.


The opinion of the court was delivered by FREUND, J.A.D.

The defendant appeals from a judgment for the plaintiffs entered by direction of the court when the defendant rested without offering testimony at the close of the plaintiffs' case. The defendant argues that the case should have been submitted to the jury and that the sole issue is the propriety of the court's action in not doing so.

The action was on contract, to recover for the loss of seven pieces...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases