MERGEL v. COLGATE-PALMOLIVE-PEET CO.


41 N.J. Super. 372 (1956)

125 A.2d 292

SOPHIE MERGEL, AS ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF ALBERT MERGEL, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. COLGATE-PALMOLIVE-PEET CO., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided August 31, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Robert C. Gruhin argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Mr. Morris Edelstein, attorney).

Mr. Robert Shaw argued the cause for the defendant-respondent (Messrs. Shaw, Pindar, McElroy & Connell, attorneys).

Before Judges GOLDMANN, SULLIVAN and BURTON.


The opinion of the court was delivered by BURTON, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).

In this appeal the plaintiff contends that the court committed error in granting defendant's motion for judgment under R.R. 4:51, at the conclusion of the case, and thereby deprived the plaintiff of her right to have the matters in issue determined by a jury.

Sophie Mergel, as administratrix ad prosequendum of the estate of Albert Mergel, deceased, brought this action...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases