1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Misc.2d
  4. 4 Misc.2d
  5. 4 Misc.2d 406 (1956)
 

SCHIMMEL v. SPIGAL

4 Misc.2d 406 (1956)

Rebecca Schimmel, Plaintiff, v. Herman Spigal et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County.

October 30, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

McCarthy & McGrath for Herman Spigal and another, defendants.

Garfield, Harkavy & Fagan for Ralph Schimmel, defendant,

Jacob D. Fuchsberg for plaintiff.

ANTHONY J. DI GIOVANNA, J.

Motion to vacate a notice by one defendant to examine a codefendant is granted. It is deplorable that so much division of judicial opinion exists concerning the right of one defendant to examine a codefendant where neither asserts affirmative claims of relief against the other. It might be helpful to have a further codification of rules respecting these examinations by the rule-making...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases