BALTIMORE v. SEABOLT

[No. 126, October Term, 1955.]

210 Md. 199 (1956)

123 A.2d 207

MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE ET AL. v. SEABOLT ET AL., CO-PARTNERS TRADING AS ROLAND INVESTMENT COMPANY

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided June 6, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph S. Kaufman and Bernard S. Melnicove, with whom were Thomas N. Biddison, City Solicitor, Shirley Brannock Jones, Assistant City Solicitor and Needle & Melnicove on the brief, for appellants.

J. Cookman Boyd, Jr., and Henry M. Decker, Jr., for appellees.

The cause was argued before BRUNE, C.J., and DELAPLAINE, COLLINS, HENDERSON and HAMMOND, JJ.


BRUNE, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is an appeal by the City of Baltimore and by intervening property owners from a declaratory decree of the Circuit Court No. 2 of Baltimore City passed in a suit instituted by the appellees determining that the Zoning Ordinance of that City is "invalid, ineffective and unenforceable insofar as it attempts to restrict to residential use only" a tract of land owned by the appellees.

The appellees, Seabolt...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases