MACCIA EX REL. MACCIA v. TYNES


39 N.J. Super. 1 (1956)

120 A.2d 263

FRANK MACCIA, AN INFANT BY VICTOR MACCIA, HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, AND VICTOR MACCIA, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. CHARLES TYNES, T/A CHARLES CLEANERS & DYERS, AND WILLIAM G. MAYO, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 30, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Ralph G. Mesce argued the cause for plaintiffs-appellants (Mr. Americus S. Muti, attorney).

Mr. Melvin B. Cohen argued the cause for defendants-respondents (Messrs. Lowenstein & Cohen, attorneys).

Before Judges CLAPP, JAYNE and FRANCIS.


The opinion of the court was delivered by CLAPP, S.J.A.D.

This is an action arising out of an auto accident. The jury returned a verdict of no cause of action, and plaintiffs appeal. The adult plaintiff was driving an auto west on Central Avenue, East Orange, and his three-year-old son, the other plaintiff, was a passenger. At the time of the accident he was making a left turn into Sanford Avenue when his car was struck by defendants' vehicle which was going east...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases