CLEMENTS v. WALKER


2 Misc.2d 400 (1956)

Mary E. M. Clements, Respondent, v. Charles L. Walker, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

January 6, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roy H. Steyer for appellant.

David Leavenworth for respondent.

HOFSTADTER, EDER and HECHT, JJ., concur.


Per Curiam.

Since the articles claimed by the plaintiff were not replevied, their value at the time of the trial should have been fixed by the decision below and the sum fixed as their value awarded to the plaintiff by the judgment, in accordance with the provisions of the Civil Practice Act (§§ 1119, 1123). These provisions are mandatory and because of noncompliance with them the decision and judgment are defective. (Arwin Sportswear Co. v. Salerno...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases