ANDERSON v. STURM


209 Or. 190 (1956)

303 P.2d 509

ANDERSON v. STURM

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Reversed November 20, 1956.

Petition for rehearing denied December 28, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

E.B. Sahlstrom, Eugene, argued the cause for appellant. On the briefs were Thompson & Sahlstrom, Eugene.

Walter J. Cosgrave, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Maguire, Shields, Morrison & Bailey, Portland.

Before WARNER, Chief Justice, ROSSMAN, PERRY and McALLISTER, Justices.


REVERSED.

PERRY, J.

The plaintiff commenced this tort action against the defendant to recover damages for the alienation of her husband's affections. The defendant is the mother of Vincent Anderson, who was the husband of the plaintiff. Upon the trial of the cause, the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff, and the defendant appeals.

The defendant assigns as error the failure of the trial court to sustain her motions for a nonsuit and a directed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases