GUARDIANSHIP OF DACH


272 Wis. 120 (1956)

GUARDIANSHIP OF DACH: STATE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE, Respondent, vs. SCHIPPER, Guardian, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

February 7, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Lorin L. Kay of Richland Center.

For the respondent there was a brief by Frank P. Fosgate, collection and deportation counsel, and Charles C. Lubcke and Clarence Simon, assistant counsel, and oral argument by Mr. Simon.


BROADFOOT, J.

Many objections are advanced to support the contention that the order is invalid. These arguments may be summarized as follows:

The governing statutes are secs. 51.22 and 46.10; that sec. 46.10 is in derogation of the common law and is to be strictly construed; that Dorothy Belle Dach was committed as an epileptic; that epilepsy is neither insanity nor mental illness; that sec. 46.10 describes neither the ward, the care and maintenance, nor the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases