1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 121 A.2d
  5. 121 A.2d 264 (1956)
 

PEEBLES v. RUDOLPH

No. 1758.

121 A.2d 264 (1956)

David Meade PEEBLES, Appellant, v. Robert I. RUDOLPH, Appellee.

Municipal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

Decided March 15, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Meade Peebles, appellant, pro se.

Samuel Z. Goldman, Washington, D. C., with whom Joseph D. Bulman, Sidney M. Goldstein and Arthur S. Feld, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellee.

Before CAYTON, Chief Judge, and HOOD and QUINN, Associate Judges.

HOOD, Associate Judge.

This appeal is from an order dismissing a complaint for not being sufficiently specific and for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.

From the complaint, four pages in length, and its ten exhibits, it appears that appellant was indebted to Esso Standard Oil Company and Esso placed the delinquent account in the hands of a collection agency which forwarded it to appellee...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases