HEWITT v. GENERAL TIRE AND RUBBER COMPANY

No. 8502.

5 Utah 2d 379 (1956)

302 P.2d 712

JACK ALDON HEWITT, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, v. THE GENERAL TIRE AND RUBBER COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF OHIO, DEFENDANT AND RESPONDENT.

Supreme Court of Utah.

October 26, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Woodrow D. White, Salt Lake City, for appellant.

Don J. Hanson, Hanson & Baldwin, Salt Lake City, for respondent.


WORTHEN, Justice.

At the conclusion of presentation of evidence in this case, respondent moved for a directed verdict, which motion was taken under advisement, pending the jury's verdict. The jury returned a verdict in favor of appellant on April 23, 1953. On the following day the clerk signed and entered the judgment on the verdict. Thereafter the respondent renewed its motion for directed verdict. The trial court granted the motion for a directed verdict and on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases