CIVIL SERV. FORUM v. TR. AUTH.


3 Misc.2d 346 (1956)

Civil Service Forum et al., Plaintiffs, v. New York City Transit Authority, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County.

February 23, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel T. Scannell for defendant.

Lester G. Knopping and Morris Weissberg for plaintiffs.

O'Donnell & Schwartz for Michael J. Quill, intervenor-defendant.


JOHN E. CONE, J.

Defendants New York City Transit Authority and the Transport Workers Union of America, CIO, challenge the legal sufficiency of the complaint pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice. The action is one brought by plaintiffs for a judgment declaring, among other things, that the collective bargaining agreement entered into by the defendants as of July 1, 1954 and its extension in September...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases