ages/logo.png">
Leagle.com Leagle.com Leagle.com
Sign in
 

DONOFRIO v. IKEA US RETAIL, LLC

Civil Action Nos. 2:18-CV-00599-AB, 2:19-CV-01286-AB, 2:19-CV-00723-AB

FRANK DONOFRIO, on behalf of himself individually and on behalf of those similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. IKEA US RETAIL, LLC, Defendant. WILLIAM V. ANTONELLI, JR., on behalf of himself individually and on behalf of those similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. IKEA HOLDING US, INC., IKEA US RETAIL, LLC, and IKEA NORTH AMERICA SERVICES, LLC, Defendants. BRANDON PAINE, on behalf of himself individually and no behalf of those similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. IKEA HOLDING US, INC., IKEA US RETAIL, LLC, and IKEA NORTH AMERICA SERVICES, LLC, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

September 25, 2020.


MEMORANDUM

Plaintiff Frank Donofrio ("Donofrio") is a 56-year-old employee of Defendant IKEA US Retail, LLC ("IKEA"). Donofrio brought this collective action alleging that IKEA violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621, et seq. ("ADEA"), by discriminating...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases

    BAILEY v. TALBERT | 179 Kan. 169 (1956) | 9kan1691313 | Leagle.com
     

    BAILEY v. TALBERT

    No. 39,798

    179 Kan. 169 (1956)

    294 P.2d 220

    MAURICE S. BAILEY and MARION G. BAILEY, Husband and Wife, Appellants, v. A.L. TALBERT and THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF NEODESHA, a corporation, Appellees.

    Supreme Court of Kansas.

    Opinion filed February 29, 1956.


    Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

    L.J. Bond, of El Dorado, argued the cause, and Robert M. Bond, of El Dorado, and D.H. Forbes, of Neodesha, were with him on the briefs for the appellants.

    T.D. Hampson, of Fredonia, argued the cause, and P.W. Stephens, of Neodesha, was with him on the briefs for the appellee.


    The opinion of the court was delivered by

    ROBB, J.:

    This was an appeal from a judgment of the trial court in favor of defendants. Plaintiffs brought the original action for cancellation of a contract of purchase. The trial court allowed reformation of the contract and entered judgment in favor of defendants for specific performance of the reformed contract by plaintiffs.

    The First National Bank of Neodesha, one of the defendants, was only the escrow...

    Let's get started

    Leagle.com

    Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
    Sign on now to see your case.
    Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

    • Updated daily.
    • Uncompromising quality.
    • Complete, Accurate, Current.

    Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

    Cited Cases

    • No Cases Found

    Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

    Citing Cases