VANDERBILT v. VANDERBILT


1 N.Y.2d 342 (1956)

Patricia W. Vanderbilt, Respondent-Appellant, v. Cornelius Vanderbilt, Jr., Appellant-Respondent. Thomas F. McCoy, Receiver and Sequestrator-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided May 31, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sol A. Rosenblatt and Charles Roden for appellant-respondent.

Monroe J. Winsten and Charles L. Raskin for respondent-appellant.

CONWAY, Ch. J., FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE, JJ., concur with DESMOND, J.; FULD, J., dissents in an opinion in which DYE, J., concurs.


DESMOND, J.

The principal question is as to the validity and applicability of this provision of section 1170-b of our Civil Practice Act, enacted in 1953: "In an action for divorce, separation or annulment, or for a declaration of nullity of a void marriage, where the court refuses to grant such relief by reason of a finding by the court that a divorce, annulment or judgment declaring the marriage a nullity had...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases