1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 208 Or.
  5. 208 Or. 131 (1956)
 

PETERSON ET UX v. PETERSON ET UX

208 Or. 131 (1956)

292 P.2d 130

300 P.2d 443

PETERSON ET UX v. PETERSON ET UX

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed July 31, 1956.

Motion to dismiss appeal denied, motion to correct notice of appeal allowed January 11, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Goldstein, Galton, Galton & Popick, Portland, for respondents.

Frank L. Whitaker, Portland, for appellants.

MOTION TO CORRECT NOTICE OF APPEAL ALLOWED.

MOTIONS TO DISMISS APPEAL DENIED.

ROSSMAN, J.

The defendants-respondents move for an order to dismiss this appeal, and the plaintiffs-appellants move for an order granting them the privilege of making a correction in the notice of appeal. The motion to dismiss is based upon these contentions:

"* * * The Plaintiffs-Appellant have failed to file with the Clerk of this Court a transcript as required...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases