POLLINO v. POLLINO


39 N.J. Super. 294 (1956)

121 A.2d 62

ROY POLLINO, PLAINTIFF, v. DAGMAR POLLINO, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided February 24, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Wilentz, Goldman, Spitzer & Sills (Mr. Warren Wilentz, appearing), attorneys for plaintiff.

Mr. David I. Stepacoff, attorney for defendant.


MARIANO, J.S.C.

Plaintiff, Roy Pollino, filed a complaint for divorce against his wife, Dagmar Pollino, alleging adultery commencing in August of 1953 and running to January 8, 1954. Defendant's answer denied the alleged adultery and, as a separate defense, stated that plaintiff had been guilty of such misconduct as to disentitle him to relief, and that defendant comes into court with unclean hands.

Plaintiff, prior to his marriage to the defendant, had been...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases