1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 42 N.J.
  5. 42 N.J. Super. 288 (1956)
 

VACCARO v. ASBURY PARK ENTERPRISES

42 N.J. Super. 288 (1956)

126 A.2d 213

SEBASTIAN P. VACCARO AND ROSE-MARIE VACCARO, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. ASBURY PARK ENTERPRISES, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 26, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. David Goldstein argued the cause for the appellants (Messrs. Goldstein & Novogrod, attorneys).

Mr. Max Brustin argued the cause for the respondent Asbury Park Enterprises.

Mr. Sidney J. Meistrich argued the cause for the respondents City of Asbury Park, Council of the City of Asbury Park, and J. Oliver Armstrong, City Manager and Acting Director of Public Works of said city.

Before Judges PROCTOR, WAESCHE and HETFIELD.

The opinion of the court was delivered by WAESCHE, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).

This suit was instituted in the Chancery Division of the Superior Court. The amended complaint, which is in two counts, is entitled "Amended Complaint and Complaint in Lieu of Prerogative Writs." The first count of the amended complaint is against the Asbury Park Enterprises, a New Jersey corporation. The second count is against the City of Asbury Park, the City Council, and J. Oliver...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases