1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 143 Conn.
  5. 143 Conn. 184 (1956)
 

CLIPFEL v. KANTROWITZ

143 Conn. 184 (1956)

C. WILLIAM CLIPFEL v. LOUISE A. KANTROWITZ

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided January 27, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William J. Galvin, Jr., for the appellant (defendant).

William M. Pomerantz, with whom, on the brief, was Dorothy E. Kelmenson, for the appellee (plaintiff).

INGLIS, C. J., BALDWIN, O'SULLIVAN and DALY, Js.

O'SULLIVAN, J.

The plaintiff brought this action to obtain (1) reformation of a written contract, (2) specific performance of the contract as reformed, and (3) damages. The court decided that reformation was unnecessary and rendered judgment for the plaintiff to recover damages on the ground that the contract as written had been broken. The defendant has appealed.

We are confronted at the outset by assignments of error directed at the finding. When, as here...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases