MALICK ET UX v. MALICK


208 Or. 107 (1956)

298 P.2d 841

MALICK ET UX v. MALICK

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed as modified June 20, 1956.

Petition for rehearing denied July 11, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark V. Weatherford argued the cause for appellants. On the briefs were Weatherford and Thompson, Albany.

Rupert E. Park, Redmond, argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.

Before WARNER, Chief Justice, and TOOZE, LUSK, BRAND and PERRY, Justices.


AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

PER CURIAM.

This is a suit for an accounting incident to the dissolution of a partnership. The trial court entered a decree and judgment in favor of defendant H.H. Malick against plaintiff F.L. Malick in the sum of $1,757.92, together with interest thereon at the rate of 6 per cent per annum from September 30, 1955. Plaintiff appeals.

1, 2. No disputed questions of law are involved on this appeal. The issue before us is simply...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases