1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ga.
  4. 94 Ga.
  5. 94 Ga. App. 220 (1956)
 

ISEN & COMPANY, INC. v. WISE

36217.

94 Ga. App. 220 (1956)

94 S.E.2d 98

ISEN & COMPANY, INC. v. WISE.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Rehearing Denied July 24, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

E. H. Stanford, for plaintiff in error.

Alton T. Milam, James A. Bagwell, Ward Matthews, Jr., contra.

QUILLIAN, J.

The general grounds of the motion insist that the evidence did not support the verdict because there was no competent evidence as to the market value of the plaintiff's piano before and after damage. The plaintiff testified the piano had a reasonable market value of $1,000 prior to damage, and in her opinion she could not get over six or seven hundred dollars for it afterwards. This was competent evidence as to market value, and the general grounds are...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases