TRAUTWEIN v. BOZZO


39 N.J. Super. 267 (1956)

120 A.2d 788

RAYMOND TRAUTWEIN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JAMES J. BOZZO AND MODESTO BOZZO, HIS WIFE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 28, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Martin L. Haines argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Dimon, Haines & Bunting, attorneys).

Mr. Robert E. Dietz argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Powell & Davis, attorneys; Mr. James M. Davis, Jr., of counsel).

Before Judges CLAPP, JAYNE and FRANCIS.


The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Goldmann reported in 35 N.J.Super. 270 (Ch. Div. 1955).

We feel constrained to add that the defendants sought for the first time in the litigation to invoke on this appeal the equitable doctrine of unclean hands adversely to the plaintiff's cause of action. While we believe that the presentation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases