1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.
  4. 272 Wis.
  5. 272 Wis. 29 (1956)
 

NORTHLAND GREYHOUND LINES v. BLINCO

272 Wis. 29 (1956)

NORTHLAND GREYHOUND LINES,INC., Appellant, vs. BLINCO, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

February 7, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by Cavanagh, Mittelstaed, Sheldon, Heide & Hartley of Kenosha, and oral argument by William A. Sheldon.

For the respondent there was a brief by Vaudreuil & Vaudreuil of Kenosha, and La France, Thompson & Zahn of Racine, attorneys, and Alfred E. La France and William E. Dye, both of Racine, of counsel, and oral argument by Alfred E. La France.

GEHL, J.

We are required to determine whether the so-called judgment is appealable. If it is not, we are without jurisdiction to consider the merits of the controversy. Wilt v. Neenah Cold Storage Co. (1907), 130 Wis. 398, 110 N. W. 177; Kling v. Sommers (1948), 252 Wis. 217, 31 N.W.2d 206. The fact that the question has not been raised is immaterial, for such failure does not confer jurisdiction. Richter v. Standard Mfg. Co. (1937), 224 Wis....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases