1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 229 F.2d
  5. 229 F.2d 68 (1956)
 

MID-CONTINENT SUPPLY CO. v. ATKINS & POTTER DRILLING CORP.

No. 5160.

229 F.2d 68 (1956)

MID-CONTINENT SUPPLY CO., a corporation, Appellant, v. ATKINS & POTTER DRILLING CORP., a corporation; T. E. Atkins and W. L. Potter, Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied January 30, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul G. Darrough, Oklahoma City, Okl. (W. H. Brown and Paul G. Darrough, Jr., Oklahoma City, Okl., were with him on the briefs), for appellant.

George L. Verity and Harry C. Marberry, Oklahoma City, Okl. (Brown & Verity, Oklahoma City, Okl., was with them on the brief), for appellees.

Before BRATTON, HUXMAN, and PICKETT, Circuit Judges.

BRATTON, Circuit Judge.

Invoking federal jurisdiction on the ground of diversity of citizenship with the requisite amount involved, Mid-Continent Supply Co. instituted this action against Atkins & Potter Drilling Corporation, T. E. Atkins, and W. L. Potter. The purpose of the action was to recover personal judgment upon five promissory notes, each for the sum of $4,291.24. The notes were executed by the drilling corporation as principal, were endorsed by the two...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases