ZIINO v. MILWAUKEE E. R. & T. CO.


272 Wis. 21 (1956)

ZIINO, Respondent, vs. MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC RAILWAY & TRANSPORT COMPANY, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

February 7, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Shaw, Muskat & Paulsen, attorneys, and John G. Quale of counsel, and oral argument by Mr. Jack R. Wiedabach and Mr. Quale, all of Milwaukee.

For the respondent there was a brief and oral argument by Joseph J. Ziino of Milwaukee.


BROADFOOT, J.

In her complaint the plaintiff alleged that the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur was applicable to the facts. The trial court agreed and submitted the special verdict based upon that doctrine. The defendant objected at the time of the trial and, in its brief filed herein, presented as one argument its contention that said doctrine was not applicable in view of the facts in this case. Upon the argument that contention was withdrawn. The facts in the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases