KAHL v. WINFREY

No. 6057.

81 Ariz. 199 (1956)

303 P.2d 526

L.H. KAHL, Appellant, v. E.B. WINFREY and Jane Doe Winfrey, husband and wife, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Arizona.

November 14, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cusick, Watkins & Frey, Tucson, for appellant.

Moore & Moore, Phoenix, for appellees.


UDALL, Justice.

Plaintiff (appellant) L.H. Kahl brought an action in replevin against defendants (appellees) E.B. Winfrey and wife which resulted in a money judgment being entered in favor of defendants and against plaintiff. After denial of the latter's motion for a new trial this appeal was taken from the judgment. The designation by which the parties appeared in the trial court will be used.

The chain of events giving rise to this suit is as follows: plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases