1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 236 F.2d
  5. 236 F.2d 44 (1956)
 

A. M. ANDREWS CO. OF OREGON v. NATIONAL LABOR REL. BD.

No. 14866.

236 F.2d 44 (1956)

A. M. ANDREWS COMPANY OF OREGON, and A. M. Andrews of Illinois, Inc., Petitioners, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

August 13, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alfred A. Hampson, Jr., Ralph R. Bailey, Maguire, Shields, Morrison & Bailey, Portland, Or., for petitioners.

Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, John Francis Lawless, Attys., N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Before STEPHENS, ORR and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

ORR, Circuit Judge.

The determination of the issue raised on this appeal rests almost exclusively on the question of whether there is substantial evidence to support the finding of the Board that the two corporations involved were a single employer within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq., and that therefore A. M. Andrews Company of Oregon was responsible for an unfair labor practice of A. M. Andrews of Illinois...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases