1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 143 Conn.
  5. 143 Conn. 132 (1956)
 

MABANK CORPORATION v. BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS

143 Conn. 132 (1956)

THE MABANK CORPORATION ET AL. v. BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF THE CITY OF STAMFORD ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided January 24, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Julius B. Kuriansky, with whom was Maurice J. Buckley, for the appellants (plaintiffs).

Arthur L. DiSesa, assistant corporation counsel, with whom, on the brief, was John M. Hanrahan, corporation counsel, for the appellee (defendant board).

George Dimenstein, with whom was Isadore M. Mackler, for the appellee (defendant Vogt).

INGLIS, C. J., BALDWIN, O'SULLIVAN, DALY and BERDON, JS.

BALDWIN, J.

The plaintiffs have appealed from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas dismissing their appeal from the action of the defendant board of zoning appeals of Stamford in granting a variance of the zoning regulations to allow the defendant Hugo Vogt to relocate his restaurant establishment.

The record of the proceedings before the board discloses the following facts. Vogt has conducted a restaurant business, where intoxicating liquors are sold to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases