BOTKIN v. BOTKIN

No. 36,656.

247 Minn. 25 (1956)

77 N.W. (2d) 172

HELEN C. BOTKIN v. DONAL B. BOTKIN.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

March 23, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roland J. Faricy, William A. Bierman, B. Warren Hart, and Faricy, Moore & Costello, for appellant.

Robert O. Sullivan, David R. Roberts, and Sullivan, Stringer, Donnelly & Sharood, for respondent.


MURPHY, JUSTICE.

This proceeding was brought by the defendant husband, Donal B. Botkin, to reduce the amount of alimony required to be paid plaintiff, Helen C. Botkin, under a stipulation embodied in a final divorce decree. The subsequent order of the trial court allowing a reduction in monthly payments is appealed by his wife on the ground that the court abused its discretion and erred as a matter of law in granting a reduction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases