WOODY v. BARNETT

No. 380.

92 S.E.2d 178 (1956)

243 N.C. 782

Thomas B. WOODY v. Hubert H. BARNETT.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 18, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Davis & Davis, Roxboro, for defendant appellant.

R. P. Reade, Durham, Redmond B. Dawes, Thomas B. Woody, Jr., Roxboro, E. C. Bryson, Durham, for plaintiff appellee.


PER CURIAM.

Upon a careful review and consideration of the judgment rolls in the previous actions and proceeding pertaining to the abandoned segment of road here involved, in the light of well established applicable principles of law, there is no sufficient evidence to support a plea of res judicata. And the case was properly submitted to the jury on the single issue. The assignments of error presented fail to show error for which the judgment should be disturbed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases