1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 208 Or.
  5. 208 Or. 50 (1956)
 

HOLLAND ET AL v. GRANT COUNTY ET AL

208 Or. 50 (1956)

298 P.2d 832

HOLLAND ET AL v. GRANT COUNTY ET AL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed June 27, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold Banta and J.R. Campbell, argued the cause for appellants. On the briefs were Yokom & Campbell, John Day, and Banta, Silven & Horton, Baker.

Michael S. Mogan, District Attorney, Canyon City, and A.S. Grant, Baker, argued the cause for respondents. On the brief were Michael S. Mogan, Grant & Fuchs, Baker, and Gene C. Rose, Baker.

Before WARNER, Chief Justice, and TOOZE, LUSK, BRAND and PERRY, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

PERRY, J.

This is a suit to enjoin the county court of Grant county, Oregon, acting for the county, from removing a bridge across the John Day river.

The trial court denied the plaintiffs the relief sought, and from the court's decree they appeal.

The facts disclose that the bridge in question was originally erected as a part of the county road system; later the county road and bridge became a part of the state highway system. In...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases