1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 237 F.2d
  5. 237 F.2d 20 (1956)
 

AMALGAMATED MEAT CUTTERS, ETC. v. NATIONAL LAB. REL. BD.

Nos. 12891, 12931.

237 F.2d 20 (1956)

AMALGAMATED MEAT CUTTERS AND BUTCHER WORKMEN OF NORTH AMERICA, AFL, LOCAL 88, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Swift & Company, Intervenor. SWIFT & COMPANY, a corporation, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Amalgamated Meat Cutters and Butcher Workmen of North America, AFL, Local 88, Intervenor.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided June 22, 1956.

Rehearing Denied September 13, 1956.

Petition for Rehearing Denied September 13, 1956.

Second Petition for Rehearing Denied October 8, 1956.

Petition for Rehearing Denied October 8, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Mozart G. Ratner, Chicago, Ill., of the bar of the Supreme Court of Illinois, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, with whom Messrs. Martin F. O'Donoghue and Thomas X. Dunn, Washington, D. C., were on the briefs, for petitioner in No. 12891 and intervenor in No. 12931.

Mr. G. Carroll Stribling, St. Louis, Mo., with whom Mr. Earl G. Spiker, Washington, D. C., was on the briefs, for intervenor in No. 12891 and petitioner in No. 12931.

Mr. Duane Beeson, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, of the bar of the Supreme Court of California, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, with whom Mr. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, was on the brief, for respondent. Mr. Winthrop A. Johns, Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, also entered an appearance for respondent.

Before FAHY, WASHINGTON and DANAHER, Circuit Judges.

Petition for Rehearing In Banc Denied October 8, 1956.

FAHY, Circuit Judge.

The major issue in these appeals is whether the National Labor Relations Board erred in ordering the Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen of North America, Local 88, hereinafter called the Union, to cease and desist from certain practices found by the Board to violate section 8(b) (4) (A),1 the "secondary boycott" provision of the National Labor...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases