1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 21 N.J.
  5. 21 N.J. 226 (1956)
 

TOMKO v. VISSERS

21 N.J. 226 (1956)

121 A.2d 502

JOHN E TOMKO, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. WILLIAM VISSERS, MAYOR, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 26, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Joseph C. Glavin argued the cause for the plaintiffs-appellants.

Mr. Edward Sachar argued the cause for the defendants-respondents (Messrs. Sachar, Sachar & Bernstein, attorneys for defendant-respondent, Green Brook Swimming Club; Mr. John Andrew Reid, attorney for defendant-respondent, Green Brook Township).

The opinion of the court was delivered by BURLING, J.

This appeal stems from the Superior Court, Law Division, which affirmed the grant of a variance by the Township Committee of Green Brook Township, Somerset County, New Jersey, on the recommendation of the local board of adjustment pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40:55-39(d). We certified the cause prior to an appellate review below.

Green Brook Township is a locale predominantly residential in character...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED
OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases