1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 144 Conn.
  5. 144 Conn. 80 (1956)
 

BURTON v. HARTFORD

144 Conn. 80 (1956)

CHARLES M. BURTON ET AL. v. CITY OF HARTFORD ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided November 20, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frederick U. Conard, Jr., with whom was Richard M. Feingold, for the plaintiffs.

Elihu H. Berman, assistant corporation counsel, with whom was George J. Ritter, corporation counsel, for the defendants.

INGLIS, C. J., BALDWIN, O'SULLIVAN, WYNNE and DALY, JS.

INGLIS, C. J.

The plaintiffs in this action are owners of properties in Hartford which are used for dwelling purposes and constitute controlled housing accommodations. The plaintiffs are, of course, taxpayers. They instituted the action against the city, its treasurer and its temporary city housing rent commissioner, praying a declaratory judgment determining whether "An Ordinance concerning Controlled Housing Accommodations," enacted March 26, 1956, by the court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases