1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 125 A.2d
  5. 125 A.2d 87 (1956)
 

INDUSTRIAL NATIONAL BANK v. DRYSDALE

Eq. No. 2100.

125 A.2d 87 (1956)

INDUSTRIAL NATIONAL BANK, Tr. v. ISABEL DRYSDALE et al.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island.

July 31, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hinckley, Allen, Salisbury & Parsons, Stuart H. Tucker, Douglas W. Franchot, Providence, for complainant.

William E. Powers, Atty. Gen., Albert J. Hoban, Adm'r of Charitable Trusts. John Cosentino, Ass't Atty. Gen., for the State,

Edwin B. Tetlow, Providence, for respondents Isabel Drysdale and Mary D. Lueck.

Tillinghast, Collins & Tanner, Nathaniel S. Thayer, Providence, for respondent Louise Drysdale Andrews.

CONDON, Justice.

This cause was previously before this court for the construction of the will of Robert Drysdale. See Industrial National Bank v. Drysdale, R.I., 114 A.2d 191. After our decision therein the parties asked leave to file a motion for reargument, and for certain exceptional reasons such leave was granted, id., 119 A.2d 729. The reargument was expressly limited to a single question, namely...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases