1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.Y.2d
  4. 1 N.Y.2d
  5. 1 N.Y.2d 20 (1956)
 

WEIL v. ATL. BEACH HOLDING CORP.

1 N.Y.2d 20 (1956)

Jay Weil et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. Atlantic Beach Holding Corporation et al., Appellants-Respondents; Harry Koeppel et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided March 15, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles E. Lapp, Jr., for respondents-appellants.

Carl E. Peterson for Atlantic Beach Holding Corporation and others, appellants-respondents.

Martin Koeppel for Mitchell M. Feinberg and others, appellants-respondents.

CONWAY, Ch. J., DESMOND, FULD, FROESSEL and VAN VOORHIS, JJ., concur; DYE, J., taking no part.

BURKE, J.

This case involves two separate causes of action; the first against the Atlantic Beach Holding Corporation for a judgment declaring that the residents of the community have a right to the use of the boardwalk in front of the club; and the second, against the defendants, Feinberg and Koeppel, for a judgment declaring that the residents of the community have a right to use that portion of Suffolk Boulevard...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases