1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 208 Or.
  5. 208 Or. 1 (1956)
 

RADCLIFFE v. FRANKLIN NAT'L INS. CO.

208 Or. 1 (1956)

298 P.2d 1002

RADCLIFFE ET UX v. FRANKLIN NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. ET AL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Reversed and remanded June 27, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas H. Tongue, III, argued the cause for appellants. On the brief were Hicks, Davis & Tongue, Portland, and Arthur W. Schaupp, Klamath Falls.

Howard K. Beebe, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Maguire, Shields, Morrison & Bailey, Portland.

Before WARNER, Chief Justice, and TOOZE, ROSSMAN, LUSK, LATOURETTE and PERRY, Justices.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

ROSSMAN, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiffs from a judgment which the circuit court entered in favor of the defendants after it had directed the jury to return its verdict for them. The plaintiffs are R. Heber Radcliffe and Ruth H. Radcliffe, husband and wife. The defendants are Franklin National Insurance Company of New York and United National Indemnity Company of New York. The plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases