1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 142 Cal.App.2d
  5. 142 Cal.App.2d 66 (1956)
 

CASE v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES

Docket No. 20947.

142 Cal.App.2d 66 (1956)

298 P.2d 50

JAMES M. CASE et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

June 4, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brennan & Cornell, Hill, Farrer & Burrill, and William E. Cornell for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Roger Arnebergh, City Attorney, Bourke Jones, Assistant City Attorney, and Alfred E. Rogers, Deputy City Attorney, Gerald Bridges and Wesley L. Nutten, Jr., for Defendants and Appellants.

WHITE, P.J.

The judgment from which all parties to the instant action have appealed reads, in part, as follows:

"IT IS ADJUDGED, DECLARED AND DECREED that Ordinance No. 100,775 of the City of Los Angeles, State of California violates good zoning practice and comprehensive zoning planning and does not satisfy or meet good zoning practice and was arbitrary and discriminatory with respect to owners of property similarly situated.

"IT IS FURTHER ADJUDGED...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases