DONLIN v. INDUS. COMM.

No. 34814.

166 Ohio St. 27 (1956)

DONLIN, A MINOR, APPELLEE, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 12, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Traxler & Beil, for appellee.

Mr. C. William O'Neill, attorney general, Mr. James L. Young and Mr. John R. Barrett, for appellant.


Per Curiam.

Defendant presents the question whether, upon the facts hereinbefore recited, the Court of Appeals, upon appellee's motion to dismiss the appeal, may dismiss the appeal in regard to the issues raised upon the first motion ruled on and retain the appeal only as to the issues raised upon the second motion ruled on.

Section 2323.181, Revised Code, provides that a motion for judgment non obstante...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases