1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 147 F.Supp.
  5. 147 F.Supp. 40 (1956)
 

B. F. GOODRICH CO. v. UNITED STATES RUBBER CO.

Civ. No. 7501.

147 F.Supp. 40 (1956)

The B. F. GOODRICH COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES RUBBER COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court D. Maryland.

December 12, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fish, Richardson & Neave, Stephen H. Philbin, William K. Kerr, New York City, Semmes, Bowen & Semmes, Lawrence Perin, Baltimore, Md., for plaintiff.

Kenyon & Kenyon, Theodore S. Kenyon, Malvin R. Mandelbaum, Arthur, Dry & Dole, Paul H. Arthur, Frederick W. Wood, New York City, Venable, Baetjer & Howard, H. Vernon Eney, Baltimore, Md., for defendant.

R. DORSEY WATKINS, District Judge.

This is an action for alleged infringement by defendant of plaintiff's1 patent No. 2,587,470, issued February 26, 1952, on an application filed in the Patent Office on December 14, 1946. For convenience, the patent in suit will sometimes be referred to as the Herzegh patent.

The answer denied infringement and set up the usual2 defenses of prior knowledge

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases