ZIPPRICH v. SMITH TRUCKING CO.


2 N.Y.2d 177 (1956)

Jacob F. Zipprich, Respondent, v. Smith Trucking Company, Inc., Appellant. William H. Creaser, Respondent, v. Smith Trucking Company, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided November 30, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hilbert I. Greene for appellant in first above-entitled action.

Hilbert I. Greene for appellant in second above-entitled action.

Paul R. Shanahan and R. J. Shanahan for respondent in first above-entitled action.

Phillip T. Young for respondent in second above-entitled action.

In the Creaser action: CONWAY, Ch. J., DESMOND, DYE and FULD, JJ., concur with FROESSEL, J.; VAN VOORHIS and BURKE, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse and to grant a new trial upon the ground that any causal connection is purely speculative between the first and the second accidents.


FROESSEL, J.

These are two personal injury actions arising out of the same accident. They were tried together, and the liability of appellant was clearly established. The alleged excessiveness of the jury's verdict in each case is beyond the province of this court to review (De Casiano v. Morgan, 308 N.Y. 526; Serano v. New York Central & H. R. R. R. Co., 188 N...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases