GUNNING v. MEAD CORPORATION

No. 972.

143 F.Supp. 35 (1956)

Emma GUNNING v. The MEAD CORPORATION.

United States District Court E. D. Tennessee, Northeastern D.

May 22, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brantley Blue, Burkett McInturff, Kingsport, Tenn., for plaintiff.

Penn, Hunter, Smith & Davis, Kingsport, Tenn., for defendant.


TAYLOR, District Judge.

At the conclusion of the trial, the Court orally from the bench made findings of fact, the transcriptions of which have been carefully examined as to correctness and sufficiency. No additional findings are deemed necessary. Decision was reserved awaiting the filing of additional briefs and for closer and more extended study of the legal principles which apply to the findings, this being one of those occasional and difficult borderline cases...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases